iwantmorethanapinkribbon
  • Blog
  • My story

A chronic condition

1/18/2016

2 Comments

 
I attended the first conference of its kind this past weekend ... the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)'s Cancer Survivorship Symposium.  This meeting was a collaboration between oncologists and primary care physicians in addressing the myriad of needs of a cancer survivor.  There were close to 1,000 people attending the conference, the bulk being in the medical profession.

I've been asked ... why would you attend such a meeting?  You are not a "survivor."  You are going to die of this disease.

To be honest, I've long struggled with the use of the word "survivor" as it does indicate that an event that is survived is in the past.  Many with cancer also struggle with the word as well.  As an teacher of English as a second/foreign language, I wonder about how much time should be spent on the semantics of the concept, but then my tired brain pulled an Elsa and I just "let it go."
Picture
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) defines a cancer survivor as anyone with a history of cancer, from the time of diagnosis and for the remainder of life, whether that is days or decades."  This is the definition that was used throughout the conference. 

There is much talk in the metastatic breast cancer community to push metastatic breast cancer into the "chronic disease" classification.  Once again, I have struggled with that concept, but after this conference, I better understand what that means.
Picture
Survivorship is a condition of its own, with its own problem list.
Picture
(The circled items are those that were addressed at the conference.)
If metastatic breast cancer is to be considered a chronic condition, then, just as it's important to understand the impact that a primary cancer has on someone for the rest of their lives, it is also important to understand the myriad of conditions that accompany a metastatic diagnosis.


Picture
Emphasis was made on how other conditions already classified as chronic have the appropriate follow-up care plans in place and that re-invention wasn't necessary, but that using those conditions as models would expedite the process.  The general consensus is that every cancer patient should receive a Cancer Survivorship Plan upon completion of their treatment and that this plan should not be dependent upon the patient pulling it together.


Two of the saddest statements made at the conference were:

"Early detection of recurrence does not make sense when no effective therapy is available." and "Not everyone in this country can afford to have cancer."

These are volatile statements.  I understand the premise of not testing for recurring disease when there are no symptoms, but if a disease can be controlled for a longer period of time using less toxic therapies, then the earlier that recurrent disease can be found seems better.  Doctors feel challenged to know what type of follow-up is needed, especially for those survivors of childhood cancers.  The general consensus was that scans or blood tumor markers should not be used unless the patient presents with symptoms

This question came up over and over ... who is going to pay for all this followup needed for a cancer patient?  There was never a satisfactory answer from anyone.


EVERYONE wants better follow-up and care.  However, given the current condition of health care provision in the United States, this can be difficult to finance.  It's not enough to have a moonshot cure for cancer if there isn't an infrastructure in place to support all those cured people.  The "cure" can come with a high cost at the physical, psychological and financial levels.

There were many talks and presentation on the value of physical movement and proper nutrition for risk reduction.  Those who called these two "whole patient" approaches as preventive measures were consistently challenged.  Risk reduction is not the same thing as prevention and risk reduction is not a guarantee.

I was able to ask questions in two of the sessions, thus getting metastatic disease into the discussion.  While metastatic disease was not the focus of this symposium, it is important that if we are going to push metastatic disease into the chronic category, then the needs and concerns of metastatic patients need to be addressed as well.  

Both of my questions were well received and applauded.  My first question was regarding the use of "risk reduction vs prevention" and the presenting doctor apologized and corrected her terminology.  My second question was more of a comment in the need for more effective treatments that didn't cause such devastating side effects, whether immediate of late-term in treating cancer.  I said that we should not accept it as "normal" that someone who survived a childhood cancer should not have to deal with the aftermath of the disease and treatment decades later.

One of the most appalling things that happened, though, was when a PhD (and co-author of a best selling nutrition book) gave me three referrals to alternative practitioners to handle my metastatic disease.  She even used the term "cure your disease" when talking about one of them because he cured someone else's Stage III disease.  I told her that there was no cure for metastatic disease and that anyone who claimed such a thing was a fraud.  She corrected herself and talked about his helping me live a long time with the disease.

Sigh.  I accepted the three names and I immediately looked them up.  I'm always wanting to know who is following whom and why.

This is what is appalling.  One of her referrals was arrested in July 2015 for practicing without a license, giving expired medications and giving a bag of dirt as a treatment protocol for a woman with metastatic breast cancer.  There are no records of his having any education of any kind beyond high school, yet he is touting himself as a chemist and doctor ... and as the one who has the cure for cancer.

If you are going to take the time to seek someone out to give a referral, it would be good to know everything about that referral and whether or not you want your name to be associated with that referral.  Needless to say, I'm not interested in any of the referrals.  I am not interested in anything she has to say.  She has lost all credibility with me. 

I am interested in evidenced based protocol, not woo-woo wishful thinking. 

I learned a lot.  I'm still processing.  I have a long way to go.  I networked like crazy, gained access to a lot of resources, talked to a lot of people involved in both advocacy and research and I came home absolutely exhausted. 

There's so much we know, yet so much we don't know.
2 Comments
Denise Paulsen
1/18/2016 08:48:26 pm

Hello, I find your writing extremely interesting. And your life. You appear to have so much mental energy for the scientific stuff. I so enjoy feeding my brain, and this is undoubtedly why I keep returning to your blog. You're a wonderfully talented communicator. I agree with not testing a cancer survivor, as they would term someone like myself. Although I don't tend to identify with these all encompassing labels. But I was dx in Nov 07 with triple negative 7cm locally "advanced" breast cancer. I had a single mastectomy, with no recon. I have never been tested since my last dose of radiation on August 28/08. The onc said I would let them know if I wasn't feeling particularly well, or if I was in pain for anything my GP couldn't treat, he would send me off for a scan. The only time this happened was last summer when I had a strange pang resonating in my lower to mid back. Of course I assumed it was bone cancer. I was sent for an MRI when a simple xray found nothing. Again, the MRI found nothing remarkable. My right arm aches these days. But the pain is bearable, so I'm in no rush to have it checked out. If it's bone cancer, they say an involuntary break will confirm. So, that's about it. I'm in no particular hurry to expedite a flurry of bad tidings. It the cancer returns, I know there's not much in their kit bag to treat me with. Triple negative is a fierce opponent. If they don't kill it off when it first presents, your chances of surviving a recurrence are dire. I live with this. It makes me rather cynical. But no matter what happens, I feel fortunate to have had this amount of time with my family post diagnosis. Women die of this in their 20's. My neighbour a few streets over was dx Stage 4 at the outset. She just turned 40. Her children are both in middle school. I am presently in my 59th year. I can't complain. I think of you often with love. Denise. xo

Reply
Nimmi Kapoor
2/1/2016 08:13:14 pm

Great post. Thank you for sharing your perspective. I continue to learn ...

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    God's Story

    _I believe we all have a story. This blog records my story and how I've lived with breast cancer both as a primary disease and a terminal disease.  I believe this is all a part of God's story for my life. This blog unapologetically includes all areas of my life: my faith, my family and my advocacy for change in the metastatic breast cancer world.

      

    The Best Metastatic Breast Cancer Blogs of the Year
    Healthline

    Archives

    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Categories

    All
    Blood Test
    Breast Cancer
    Chemo-cap
    Chemotherapy
    China
    China Post Office
    Construction
    Fish Testing
    Hair Cut
    Hair Loss
    Her2
    Hong Kong
    Humor
    Joy
    Losing Eyebrows
    Nadir
    Pink Ribbon
    Shengli
    Staging
    Starfish
    Symbolism
    Tnm Rating
    Tumor Shrinkage
    Victory
    White Cell Count
    Xile

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.